|
Is
Wal-Mart Too Liberal?
Once a paragon of
Red State values, it's being criticized for bowing to political
correctness.
Daniel McGinn
NEWSWEEK
May 31, 2008
[back to top]
For investors, most annual meetings
are anything but a hot ticket. They're typically held in small
auditoriums and feature an agenda that makes C-Span look like an action
thriller. Then there's Wal-Mart, the Arkansas-based retailer whose
shareholder meetings are celebrity-packed, high-wattage showcases. Last
year's gathering featured the comedian Sinbad and musical numbers by
Jennifer Lopez and the cast of "High School Musical." But amid these
surprise performances, the most unexpected moment came when shareholder
activists were each given three minutes at the podium. Most offered
run-of-the-mill liberal criticisms that hit every large company: a Roman
Catholic nun urged Wal-Mart to support universal health insurance;
several speakers suggested the company rein in executives' huge
paychecks. But from the other end of the spectrum came Peter Flaherty,
lambasting Wal-Mart for being too nice to unions, too concerned about
the environment and too accommodating to gays and lesbians. "People shop
at Wal-Mart because of low prices, not because the company is
politically correct," Flaherty shouted at the crowd.
Come again? With its deep roots in Red
State America and a reputation for upholding "family values," Wal-Mart
seems an unlikely target for conservative criticism. It's the company
that banned sales of CDs with offensive lyrics, refused to stock racy
magazines like Maxim and declined (until 2006) to sell the Plan B
emergency contraceptive pill. But in recent years, as it faced growing
pressure from liberal activists, Wal-Mart has begun to make changes. It
began offering more-robust health-insurance coverage to workers. Its CEO
voiced support for raising the minimum wage. It has launched an
ambitious environmental program. As a result, while Wal-Mart continues
to face criticism from liberal groups, it's now simultaneously being
criticized by some conservatives, who say the company's concessions to
liberals are hurting its business. "This is kind of a guerrilla fight,"
says Flaherty, who heads a tiny right-wing think tank called the
National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC), which holds just a few thousand
dollars in Wal-Mart stock.
Shareholder activism has been around
since the 1940s, when the SEC first began letting investors file
resolutions. At first, most shareholders focused on bottom-line issues,
but in the late 1960s, Vietnam War protesters began filing resolutions
against companies that provided materials (including napalm) for the
war. By the 1980s, activists had become a fixture at annual meetings,
speaking out on issues like companies' investments in South Africa or
the use of sweatshop labor. While conservative pro-life groups have
occasionally filed proxy resolutions, says researcher Beth Young of the
Corporate Library, shareholder activism has been dominated by liberal
interests.
Now that's changing. Flaherty, a
former grass-roots organizer for Ronald Reagan, argues that
conservatives have been slow to recognize that today it's corporations,
not government, that drive many big social changes. That's been true
recently on issues like gay rights, health-care costs and the
environment. So since 2006, Flaherty and the five-person staff at NLPC
have been filing proposals and attending annual meetings. So far this
spring, they've spoken at the shareholder meetings of General Electric,
Boeing and Anheuser-Busch; next week they're at United Airlines. And
they're not alone: the right-leaning Free Enterprise Action Fund (FEAF),
a tiny libertarian mutual fund, filed resolutions with 20 companies this
spring, including Wal-Mart. Most of the FEAF resolutions argue that
companies should be more skeptical and resistant as environmentalists
push them to reduce their carbon footprint. Some investors apparently
agree: at last week's ExxonMobil meeting, where a group of Rockefeller
heirs unsuccessfully urged the company to broaden its focus on renewable
energy, a speech by FEAF manager Steve Milloy received loud applause.
Environmental issues are at the heart
of Flaherty's complaints about Wal-Mart, too. In a 46-page report the
NLPC will release this month, staffer John Carlisle writes that Wal-Mart
customers aren't buying many of the organic products it's begun
stocking; that the energy-efficient compact fluorescent light bulbs it's
been touting aren't really good for the environment (because they
contain mercury), and that its support for legislation to cap carbon
emissions will only hurt consumers and its bottom line. (Wal-Mart
responds that its environmental initiatives "are not only good for the
environment—they are good for our business, too.") The NLPC says
Wal-Mart is naive to think incremental compromises will ever really
placate liberal critics. "The more Wal-Mart tries to appease the Left,
the more the Left demands," the report concludes.
While most corporations look on them
as gadflies, shareholder activists occasionally do bring about change.
Many U.S. companies divested South African holdings under pressure in
the 1980s, for instance. But most shareholder resolutions garner very
few votes, and Flaherty's group is getting limited traction so far; its
resolution against Wal-Mart didn't get enough votes last year, so it
lost its spot on the agenda at Wal-Mart's 2008 meeting, which takes
place this week. Some observers think political discussions don't belong
at annual meetings in the first place. "The corporate ballot box is not
the best place to have debates on broader social topics," says Charles
Elson, a University of Delaware governance expert. But as long as
businesses grapple with fast-rising health-care costs, the growing
concern over the environment and other hot-button political issues,
corporate meetings will likely see more strange bedfellows indeed.
[back to top]
Does Wal-Mart sell
inferior goods?
By Justin Wolfers,
NY Times- Freakonomics Blog
May 30th, 2008
[back to top]
Are Wal-Mart’s Products Normal?
Emek Basker is an incredibly creative
(and under-appreciated) industrial organization economist. She is also
surely the leading Wal-Mart-ologist, and has been studying big box
stores for several years.
Her most recent piece provides a very
nice teaching example highlighting the importance of the income
elasticity of demand; she also managed the perfectly accurate but cheeky
turn of phrase that we all dream about sneaking into an academic paper:
In this note, I estimate the income elasticity of revenue for Wal-Mart
and Target over the last ten years. Because some consumers are likely to
view each discounter’s products as normal while others view them as
inferior, the aggregate relationship could go either way and depends on
the size of the two groups as well as on the magnitude of their
elasticities of demand (positive and negative).
I find that demand for Wal-Mart’s
products exhibits a negative income elasticity and Target’s demand
exhibits a positive income elasticity … For the average consumer, then,
it appears that shopping at Target is perfectly normal, but shopping at
Wal-Mart is not.
Given these findings, perhaps Rob
Jensen’s Giffen good expedition team needs a Wal-Mart-ologist. Oh, and
in case you are wondering how Target and Wal-Mart are doing, here are
their latest stock price movements: Given Basker’s estimates, it is
probably no surprise that the current slowdown is good news for
Wal-Mart, but bad news for Target.
It turns out that Basker’s findings
are no surprise to Wal-Mart: In October 2007, CEO Lee Scott argued that
“Our low prices and low-cost business model should give us an advantage
over other retailers if things get more difficult for consumers.”
[back to top]
Tenn.
withdraws from Wal-Mart energy audit program
By AP,
CNN Money
May 28th, 2008
[back to top]
NEW YORK (Associated Press) -
Tennessee has withdrawn from a partnership with Wal-Mart that would have
made its state capitol the first to undergo an extensive energy audit by
the nation's largest retailer, state and company officials said
Wednesday.
Earlier this month Wal-Mart Stores
Inc. announced partnerships with 19 states and Puerto Rico to help find
ways to cut energy costs at their state capitols.
"The governor's office notified us
that they were withdrawing from the program, and that's all we know,"
Wal-Mart spokesman Dennis Alpert said.
"We had already started the
conversations with the governor's office and staff to make it the
first," he said. "It was probably going to take place in mid-June."
Under the program announced May 6 at
the National Governors Association's State Summit on Clean Power and
Efficiency, engineers paid by Wal-Mart will visit the capitol facilities
to examine lighting, heating, ventilation, air conditioning systems,
refrigeration equipment and building structures.
"We're supportive of Wal-Mart's
broader initiative," Will Pinkston, senior adviser to Tennessee Gov.
Phil Bredesen, said in an e-mail. "But we've had a couple of false
starts that probably were unique to Tennessee, and we've run into some
unrelated issues that frankly complicated things." Pinkston did not
elaborate on those issues.
"All things considered, we're just
going to move in a different direction right now," he said.
Bredesen, a Democrat, has separately
created an energy task force to examine ways to improve Tennessee's
energy performance.
The other states that have signed up
for Bentonville, Ark.-based Wal-Mart's program include Arkansas,
Connecticut, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana,
Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina, South Dakota, Virginia and West Virginia.
Minnesota's Republican Gov. Tim
Pawlenty said at the May announcement that the public-private
partnership was an example of how governors can lead an effort to become
greener. "The cleanest and cheapest energy is the energy we save," he
said.
[back to top]
Girl stung by
scorpion in Wal-Mart watermelon
Associated Press
May 27th, 2008
[back to top]
BARBOURSVILLE, W.Va. (AP) — One
young shopper at a Wal-Mart in West Virginia had to watch out for more
than falling prices.
A 12-year-old girl picking up a
seedless watermelon from a bin was stung Sunday by a tan, inch-long
scorpion that had apparently stowed away in a shipment from Mexico.
Megan Templeton, of Barboursville, was
taken to the hospital as a precaution but later released. Her father,
William Templeton, said the pain was a little worse than a bee sting.
He initially didn't believe his
daughter when she said she had been stung by a scorpion, but then he saw
the critter scurry underneath a box. It was captured by Wal-Mart
employees.
Most of the nearly 2,000 kinds of
scorpions are not dangerous to humans.
[back to top]
Wal-Mart
executive vice president sells shares
The Associated Press
May 27, 2008
[back to top]
NEW YORK An executive vice president
of discount retailer Wal-Mart Stores Inc. sold 71,450 shares of common
stock, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
In a Form 4 filed with the SEC Friday,
Eduardo Castro-Wright reported selling the shares on Wednesday and
Thursday for $56 apiece.
Insiders file Form 4s with the SEC to
report transactions in their companies' shares. Open market purchases
and sales must be reported within two business days of the transaction.
Wal-Mart is based in Bentonville, Ark.
[back to top]
The worst mistake by Walmart
SAP will be
devastating replacing its homegrown IT version
Susan Hicks
India Daily
May 26, 2008
[back to top]
It is the tale of non-tech companies
failing to understand the effect of mismanaged and undocumented IT
development gown in-house. Even worse mistake is to try and replace the
same with enterprise system software like SAP.
SAP can do little to control the
organizational indiscipline and lack of competence among the employees
of this corporation. What WalMart should have done is to first
reengineer the IT system, reform its IT level organizational problems
and then bring in external software systems like SAP.
What SAP will do is to first take away
the freedom of development. It can be good for an organization that has
corrected the root causes of troubles (indiscipline) through
reengineering existing systems. They will try and create the same flaws
within SAP, spend much more money and after five years, blame SAP.
Port Authority of NY and NJ and World
bank in Washington DC. are an ideal examples. They bought into SAP four
years back. They stopped talking to other vendors and spread an
impression that software like SAP, PeopleSoft or Oracle Financial will
solve all their problem and make them reach ‘Nirvana.’
Four years later they are back into
their old habits. They now spend much more money. They blame these
enterprise level software for all their troubles. The meta-development
still lacks documentation and rigorous processes.
[back to top]
Pet-Food Companies Settle
Lawsuit
Wall Street Journal
May 24th, 2008
[back to top]
A group of about 30 companies sued
over contaminated pet food linked to the deaths of perhaps thousands of
dogs and cats have agreed to pay $24 million to pet owners in the U.S.
and Canada.
The deal would affect people who
incurred expenses directly related to the illness or death of a pet
linked to the food, which was at the center of the biggest-ever U.S.
pet-food recall in 2007. Many affected pet-food makers are still trying
to win back previously loyal users who switched brands following the
recall.
Among the companies settling the suit
are Menu Foods Income Fund; Procter & Gamble Co., which makes Iams pet
food; Colgate-Palmolive Co., maker of Hill's; Nestlé SA, maker of
Purina; and Mars Inc., maker of Pedigree. Retailers including Wal-Mart
Stores Inc., Target Corp., Petco Animal Supplies Inc. and Pet Smart Inc.
were also part of the suit.
Nearly 300 people sued the companies
in state and federal courts. They and perhaps thousands of other pet
owners would be eligible for payments under the deal. The settlement is
detailed in papers filed late Thursday in U.S. District Court in Camden,
N.J. It still needs a judge's approval. A court hearing on the
settlement is scheduled for Friday.
"We think it's a strong settlement
legally and economically for affected pet owners in the wake of a
terrible tragedy," said Russell Paul, a lawyer for plaintiffs in the
suit.
"We are fully supportive of the
agreement and confident that this matter is moving toward a resolution,"
said a Mars spokeswoman. P&G said that since the recall, it has changed
its ingredient sourcing and relaunched affected wet foods with new
packaging and improved formulas.
The pet food was discovered to contain
wheat gluten imported from China that was contaminated with melamine, a
chemical used to make plastics. Menu Foods was the first company to
issue recalls.
Some of the companies have already
paid out more than $8 million to people whose pets were sickened or died
after eating the contaminated food.
Under terms of the deal, pet owners
could be reimbursed for all reasonable expenditures, including
veterinarian bills and burial or cremation costs.
In addition to those expenses, pet
owners can request reimbursement for the cost or fair-market value --
whichever is higher -- of a deceased pet or one purchased in
replacement. Owners who don't have documentation of expenses can get as
much as $900 each. All claims are subject to review.
The companies said they will donate
any money left in the fund after claims are paid to animal-welfare
charities.
Settlement details were originally to
have been filed in court about two weeks ago, but it took longer to hash
out the deal, partly because it had to be made to conform to U.S. and
Canadian law.
[back to top]
Wal-Mart Canada
Selects New Ad Agency
Supermarket News
May 22, 2008
[back to top]
MISSISSAUGUA, Ontario — Wal-Mart
Canada here has selected noted Canadian brand marketer J. Walter
Thompson as its advertising agency of record in Canada. JWT replaces
U.S.-based Publicis, except in Quebec, where Wal-Mart Canada continues
to be represented by Allard-Johnson. Publicis had represented Wal-Mart
since its arrival in Canada in 1994. “JWT will be a valuable partner in
helping shape our future public and consumer image in Canada,” Vi Konkle,
chief customer officer of Wal-Mart Canada, said in a statement. Thompson
is perhaps best known in Canada for its work with quick-service
restaurant chain Tim Hortons
[back to top]
Foreign
companies defend China earthquake aid
By JOE McDONALD
Associated Press
05.22.08
[back to top]
BEIJING - Foreign companies are
defending themselves against accusations spread on Chinese Web sites
that they are doing too little to help earthquake survivors.
Online comments called for boycotts of
McDonald's (nyse: MCD - news - people ), Wal-Mart (nyse: WMT - news -
people ), Nokia (nyse: NOK - news - people ) and others - in one case
calling them "International Super-Misers" - but companies said they felt
no impact.
"We feel very proud of what we've
done. We've done a lot," said Thomas Jonsson, a spokesman for Nokia
Corp., which donated food, tents and mobile phones for rescuers. On
Wednesday, it pledged 35 million yuan ($5 million) for reconstruction.
McDonald's Corp. said it has served
more than 40,000 meals to quake survivors and rescue workers and pledged
10 million yuan ($1.5 million) Wednesday to build new schools in quake
areas.
"We've been involved in helping and
responding since day one," said McDonald's spokeswoman Lisa Howard.
By Tuesday, foreign companies had
donated 1.2 billion yuan ($175 million) in cash, plus supplies worth 108
million yuan ($15.5 million), according to the government.
Despite that, nationalistic Chinese
Web surfers who react angrily to any perceived slight to their country
have accused foreign companies of failing to provide enough help.
A posting on popular search engine
Baidu.com (nasdaq: BIDU - news - people )'s blog service listed
corporate donations and said they were smaller than those after the 2004
Indian Ocean tsunami.
Comments on online bulletin boards
criticized McDonald's Corp., Yum Brands Inc.'s KFC restaurants, Toyota
Motor Corp. (nyse: TM - news - people ), Nokia, South Korea's Samsung
Electronics Corp. and French retailer Carrefour SA.
Chinese nationalists often have
conflicted feelings toward foreign companies, which have helped to fuel
the country's economic boom but are seen as rivals to local companies.
Among other companies, Wal-Mart Stores
Inc. said it has given food, some 3,000 tents and other aid worth 3
million yuan ($430,000) and added to that by using its distribution
network to move supplies to the disaster area.
"We are reacting very quickly in
support," said Wal-Mart spokesman Jonathan Dong.
Nokia sent 5,000 mobile phones for use
by rescuers and sent employees into the disaster area to maintain them,
Jonsson said.
"For us initially the most important
thing was to get our relief effort going, and once we had it going we
could communicate about it, but some people were quick to think we
weren't doing anything," he said. "We've seen these criticisms going
away and our efforts being better understood as the days go along."
Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All
rights reserved
[back to top]
Even
kids come to fight
Wal-Mart East end
worries about loss of good jobs
Peter Kuitenbrouwer,
National Post
Thursday, May 22, 2008 [back to top]
Leanne Wild, 34, and her daughter
Jubilene, 2½ (named for the Hebrew word Jubilee, her mom says) arrived
in the grand lobby at 655 Bay St. at about 11:15 a. m. yesterday. Both
wore bike helmets; Jubilene wore mittens and little yellow rain boots.
The little girl stood on the gleaming granite in the lobby, dwarfed by a
cathedral ceiling, and asked: "Mom, can I have an apple?"
With Jubilene in a bike seat, mother
and daughter had just rode in from the Gerard India Bazaar along the
Dundas and Gerrard streets bike paths. It was an epic journey of sorts,
from the little house she bought two years ago, across the river,
through rain showers and down busy streets to the corridors of
bureaucratic power.
They joined about 100 residents of
Leslieville and environs who packed a sterile hearing room on the 16th
floor of this building, home of the Ontario Munipal Board, to voice
their opposition to a Smart!Centres plan to rezone about nine hectares
of employment land on Eastern Avenue for a big-box shopping plaza.
"We're not shop owners," said Ms.
Wild, unwinding her long, damp scarf. "We're just residential folks in
the neighbourhood. I'm frustrated in general by Smart!Centres and the
way they operate. I like the downtown small shops owned by local
people."
The city last year turned down the
Smart!Centres project; the company appealed to the OMB. Provincially
appointed OMB judges have power to overturn council. Yesterday James
McKenzie, who presides over this hearing, was outraged when the lawyers
told him the case would take 26 weeks. "This is not going to be an
open-ended process," he told the 16 lawyers. "Let me disabuse you of
that notion right now."
After lunch, the lawyers agreed with
Mr. McKenzie to spend 17 weeks on the hearing, and wrap up by Oct. 2.
Smart!Centres said its key witness will be Tom Smith, vice-president of
development, who has taken his case directly to Torontonians over the
past few weeks with appearances on television, radio and in print.
The City of Toronto and Smart!Centres
have two lawyers each, as do the East Toronto Community Coalition,
Talisker, which owns the BMW dealership near the Don Valley Parkway,
Mark Flowers, which owns land east of the disputed property, and Loblaws,
which owns a store nearby.
People from the neighbourhood wore
black T-Shirts with the slogan "Good Jobs Matter," which the coalition
was selling for $20 each. They say they prefer film jobs or other
high-paying work to Wal-Mart jobs on the site. Toronto Film Studios is
leaving the spot at the end of the year to go to the new Film Port in
the port; Wal-Mart is the usual anchor tenant for Smart!Centres.
I asked Dennis Wood, Smart!Centres'
lead lawyer, what he thinks of the slogan, "Good Jobs Matter."
"There's a difference of opinion
between my client and them about whether good jobs of the kind they're
talking about are achievable on that site," Mr. Wood said. "It's the
difference between 75% of something and 100% of nothing."
But Brendan O'Callaghan, the City of
Toronto lawyer, said industrial and commercial users occupy 94% of the
land from the Don River east to Coxwell Avenue, from Eastern Avenue to
Lakeshore Boulevard, including Canada Post's mammoth South Central
processing plant and the Lever factory. He says rezoning land in the
heart of this area for retail could cause all the others to rezone and
close factories.
"It's a tremendously successful
employment area," Mr. O'Callaghan said.
A win for either side may well not be
the end of the story. Eric Gillespie, lawyer for the local residents,
noted that his firm fought Smart!Centres for 10 years to keep Wal-Mart
out of Guelph. In the end Smart!Centres settled, building a berm to
protect a local Jesuit seminary from its big box, he said.
"The Jesuits just announced that they
are going to begin a reforestation project that will take 500 years,"
Mr. Gillespie said. So I guess the mitigation measures have worked."
But as he spoke, I could see the
wheels turning in the head of his client, Kelly Carmichael, who heads
the community coalition. "Ten years," she was thinking. "I'll have to
sell a lot of T-shirts."
The hearing continues at 10 a. m.
today.
Copyright © 2007 CanWest Interactive,
a division of CanWest MediaWorks Publications, Inc.. All rights
reserved.
[back to top]
Wal-Mart
rang up $2.2M in 1Q government lobbying
Associated Press
05.20.08
[back to top]
WASHINGTON - Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the
world's largest retailer, spent $2.2 million in the first quarter to
lobby on consumer product safety legislation and a host of other issues,
according to a disclosure report.
In the last five months, the House and
Senate have passed their versions of legislation that would toughen
inspections of toys and other products made outside the United States,
in response to millions of recalled products that have sickened
children. Both bills increase penalties for companies that violate
safety rules and increase funding for the Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
Wal-Mart (nyse: WMT - news - people )
has said it has implemented certain safeguards of its own, including
independent laboratory testing for products it sells. A top company
lobbyist also said the company would follow whatever new federal rules
are enacted.
The Bentonville, Ark.-based company
also lobbied the federal government on immigration reform, climate
change and renewable energy legislation, the farm bill and food safety,
health, labor and corporate tax issues, digital television matters and a
bill that would make organized retail crime a federal felony.
In the January-to-March period,
Wal-Mart lobbied Congress, White House, U.S. Trade Representative's
office, and several other departments, including Commerce, Energy, State
and Health and Human Services, according to the report filed April 21
with the House clerk's office.
Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All
rights reserved
[back to top]
Wal-Mart settles whistleblower case, terms not disclosed
Associated Press
05.20.08
[back to top]
FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. - An employee in
Wal-Mart's labor relations department has settled her discrimination
lawsuit with the world's largest retailer.
Rita Miles sued in 2006, saying she
was harassed and given poor evaluation scores because she refused to
shred documents relating to the investigation of Tom Coughlin, a former
vice chairman convicted of fraud.
The terms of the settlement filed
Friday in U.S. District court in Fayetteville weren't disclosed. The
suit was dismissed with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled.
Miles' suit against Wal-Mart Stores
Inc. (nyse: WMT - news - people ) claims that the Bentonville-based
retailer violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, passed by Congress in 2002
after corporate scandals at Enron Corp., WorldCom Inc. and other
companies.
The suit claimed that Miles was told
to destroy hard copies of documents relating to the investigation of
Coughlin, who has been sentenced to home detention after pleading guilty
to stealing money, merchandise and gift cards from the retailer.
Wal-Mart has said that the company
kept copies of all documents requested by the U.S. Department of Justice
subpoena in the Coughlin case.
Dauphne Moore, a spokeswoman for
Wal-Mart, wouldn't say whether Miles was still employed at Wal-Mart.
"The case has been settled and the
terms are confidential," she said.
Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All
rights reserved.
[back to top]
A Wal-Mart supplier
accused of sweatshop
By Jian Wen ,
China Real News
May 19th, 2008 [back to top]
Hsing Toys (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a
supplier of Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) , has been accused of sweatshop
conditions. At Tai Hsing, workers are forced to work at least 66 hours
per week with very low pay. According to some experts, Wal-Mart's
low-price purchasing strategy is based on suppliers' exploitation of
Chinese workers.
[back to top]
Wal-Mart
moves forward with new Marketside stores
Reuters
Fri May 16, 2008
[back to top]
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wal-Mart Stores
Inc (WMT.N: Quote, Profile, Research)is now hiring store managers to
work at Marketside, new smaller format stores the world's largest
retailer is preparing to open in Arizona.
Marketside is described as "the
neighborhood market for busy people with a taste for fresh and delicious
food."
Last year, Wal-Mart's British
supermarket rival Tesco (TSCO.L: Quote, Profile, Research) entered the
U.S marketplace, opening Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Markets stores in
California, Arizona and Nevada. Tesco is seeking to woo U.S. shoppers
with smaller convenience stores that emphasize ready-to-eat meals and
fresh produce.
Wal-Mart has launched
www.workformarketside.com, a website that currently lists eight job
openings for Marketside managers and assistant managers in four Arizona
cities.
The site says Marketside will
"simplify the daily challenge of creating an enjoyable meal by providing
inspiring choices, while also offering everyday favorites at great
prices in an easy-to-shop environment."
Wal-Mart, whose No. 2 British
supermarket chain Asda competes with No. 1 Tesco in the United Kingdom,
has long been expected to open a new, smaller store concept that would
rival Tesco's stores in the States.
Wal-Mart is now working on launching
the convenience store-sized markets in four cities southeast of Phoenix.
Store application plans call for the
stores to occupy roughly 15,000 square feet. That is less than half the
average size of Wal-Mart's Neighborhood Market grocery stores, and a
small fraction of the size of its Supercenters, which combine grocery
stores with general merchandise and can be more than three times the
size of a U.S. football field.
A story in the Financial Times said on
Friday that Marketside locations will prepare and serve food, and
include a kitchen, food counters and seating for up to nine people.
Wal-Mart spokesman Nick Agarwal said
the retailer tests lots of different formats.
"We'll no doubt announce more in due
course but not at this stage," he said of the retailer's plans for the
new stores.
(Reporting by Aarthi Sivaraman and
Nicole Maestri, editing by Will Waterman and Steve Orlofsky)
© Thomson Reuters 2008. All rights
reserved.
[back to top]
The Emergence of Real Trade Unionism in Chinese Wal-Mart Stores
Chinese Labor News Translations
Reported by Big Box Collaborative
http://www.bbc.wikispaces.net/CampaignerEmail14May08
[back to top]
The trade unions in Chinese Wal-Mart
stores are often dismissed as hollow shells set up by the All China
Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) without workers' involvement. But
through monitoring Chinese media and online blog discussions among
Chinese Wal-Mart employees, CLNT has found workers who take an active
interest in their store union, and at least in one case, of an elected
rank and file trade union chair using the trade union platform to
actively defend workers' interests. While most – if not all – of the
trade union branches are heavily dominated by Wal-Mart management or
local governments, some workers have seized this union-building exercise
and try to turn the unions into a body that they identify as their own
to protect and to use in their struggle against Wal-Mart management.
Background
There were two stages of
union-building at Wal-Mart. Unionization at the first 17 stores was
initiated by the ACFTU, in July and August 2007. Most of these 17
involved ACFTU quietly organizing rank and file employees. The ACFTU
approached workers after work hours outside the stores and mobilized
them to submit an application to set up a union branch. These efforts
had culminated in democratic elections of trade union committees and
trade union chairs by workers willing to take the risk to put themselves
forward as candidates. Such election often took place in the early hours
of the morning without Wal-Mart's knowledge. When these unions sprang up
one after another for the two weeks Wal-Mart was taken aback and refused
to recognize them.
Wal-Mart then seeing the problem if
this trend was to continue, changed its stance and decided it was better
to have the ACFTU working with it than against it. It approached the
ACFTU and negotiated to sign a memorandum which allowed for trade union
branches to be openly established at the remaining of its 60 Chinese
stores (see CLNT March 2007). After this, the ACFTU abandoned its
surreptitious organizing efforts and reverted to its long-time practice
of seeking management approval when setting up union branches and union
committees. Reports from the China press describing the establishment of
these union branches clearly showed that this allowed Wal-Mart to
intervene and manipulate the operations of the union branches, sometimes
reportedly with the connivance of pro-business local Party branches and
district trade unions. Today China has just over 100 Wal-Mart stores,
and all of them presumably have trade union branches.
There has been curiosity in China and
abroad to know what is happening within these Wal-Mart union branches.
ACFTU's critics have presumed that all of the branches will be quiescent
stooges of Wal-Mart and the ACFTU. For instance, Han Dongfang, director
of China Labor Bulletin in Hong Kong, in a recent speech in Los Angeles
ridiculed these Wal-Mart unions as a mere window-dressing exercise.
A search of Chinese websites and web
blogs reveals a mixed but encouraging story. Although many of the
Wal-Mart Trade Unions are indeed under the control and manipulation of
Wal-Mart management and local Communist Party organs, at least one has
been negotiating with management to remediate labor rights violations
and to improve the income and work conditions of its members. Our regret
is that based on these web searches alone it is not possible to
establish how many have really taken action to further workers'
interests.
We have selected four cases of
Wal-Mart trade union branches to illustrate the various situations faced
in the 100 branches. At least three of these (possibly all four) belong
to the first batch of branches set up secretly before 16 August 2006.
These four cases fall under two
categories: unions controlled by the Wal-Mart management and/or the
local Communist Party resulting in inactive union branches (Cases 1 &
2), and unions in which the membership treat their union branches as
their own and resist being controlled by outside forces and corrupt
officials (Cases 3 & 4).
Case 1. Union branch controlled by
Wal-Mart management Shenzhen Jiali Center Wal-Mart Store #3424
Based on two blogs written by workers
from this store, it is unclear whether the union was set up without
management's knowledge or openly. It seems that the original union
committee was not completely under management control, but has become so
after a series of manipulations by management, such as by replacing
elected trade union committee members with management staff. This is why
the website contains a cry for help; "It's over! It's over! Come and
save this Wal-Mart trade union!" It is likely that Wal-Mart was able to
dominate the branch with the silent consent of the local Party, which
moved into the store to set up a Party branch on 14 December 2006.
Case 2. Union branch controlled by the
Chinese Communist Party Shenyang Taiyuan Street Wal-Mart Store #5780
This Wal-Mart union branch in Shenyang
City in the North-east province of Liaoning has been hailed by the Party
as a success story because it was the first Wal-Mart store in China to
have a Party branch. The trade union branch was set up without
Wal-Mart's knowledge in the small hours of the morning of 12 August
2006; and four days later an "underground" Party branch and Youth League
branch were set up. The trade union branch was quickly controlled by the
Party, which declared it was "not intervening in the work of foreign
enterprises", i.e., the Party branch would make sure it that the union
branch did not interfere with management. Reading between the lines, it
is obvious that the trade union only performs some formalistic functions
at the store. This case reflects the government's stated goal to
"setting up trade union branches to facilitate the setting up of Party
branches".
Case 3. Trade union members struggling
against corrupt elected union officials Shenzhen Hujing Wal-Mart Store
#2701.
The Hujing Wal-Mart Store trade union
was also set up secretly. It was in fact the second store in China and
the first in Shenzhen City to have a union branch. It was a time when
joining the union and running for office was a risky undertaking. But
Zhou Liang, an ordinary worker stepped forth and got himself
democratically elected. The blog translated here indicates that he and
the elected accountant soon became corrupt, embezzling trade union
funds, lording over the workers and doing nothing. The members are now
trying to get rid of them and to re-organize a new committee. An
interesting point to note about this case is that the trade union
members, having elected their representatives (as opposed to being
appointed by management or by an upper level of the trade union or by
the Communist Party), insisted that they be held accountable. The
experience of electing union cadres of their own choice has arguably
created a sense of ownership over the union, and feel they have the
right to dismiss these representatives when they did not live up to the
expectations of their constituency. A few employees are willing to
organize an investigation committee and signature campaign to get rid of
Zhou and the accountant, despite encountering enormous pressure from
Wal-Mart management during work hours.
Case 4. Trade Union struggling against
Wal-Mart management Nanchang Bayi WM Store # 5782.
The Nanchang Bayi trade union was
clandestinely set up on 14 August 2006. The chair, Gao Haitao, was
elected by popular vote. Since then he had fought against Wal-Mart
management over one issue after another. It is significant that he had
studied law on his own while supporting himself by working at Wal-Mart
part-time. In 2005 he passed a nation-wide examine in law and decided to
stay on in Wal-Mart as a full-timer. His legal knowledge became his main
weapon to fight against Wal-Mart.
We have translated a very long blog
related to this case that includes two articles that provide the
background information on Gao and the struggles he has been going
through (Click here to view translation: CLNT_WMTU_nanchang_blog). But
just as interesting are the large number of comments (including a few
from supervisors and managers) from Wal-Mart stores all over China that
support him, hailing him as a genuine trade union leader. Some suggest
that he should organize and train the trade union chairs in all of the
other Wal-Mart stores. Many address him respectfully as "Chairman Gao"
though he is not their union chair and is in fact just a young rank and
file worker in one of the many stores. There are also suggestions for
collective actions. One, for instance, suggests that they start
collecting funds, and one writes that he is willing to contribute 100
RMB a month of his cigarette money to start a union fund.
It is alleged in this blog that
Wal-Mart has tried one trick after another to control Gao. One attempt
was to get the city level union on be on its side, and then to create a
so-called union working committee at city level headed by a manager to
override the workplace unions of the three Wal-Mart stores in the city.
Gao refused to go along with this and sought help from the ACFTU in
Beijing, which supported Gao and overrode the decision of the city-level
union.
In two instances, Gao fought
management against unfair dismissal and succeeded. This was seen as so
unusual by other workers that membership suddenly jumped many fold.
Being required by the Trade Union Law
to pay two percent of the total payroll to the workplace union as union
activity fees, Wal-Mart tried to retrieve this expense by skimping on
bonuses and an annual holiday gift. This provoked Gao to write an open
letter to trade union members that argued against shifting the
responsibility of workers' welfare onto the union (Click here to view
translation: CLNT_WMTU_nanchang_letter ).
It has become a pattern that whatever
Wal-Mart management does, the city-level union seconds it. Time and
again Gao had to seek help from the ACFTU in Beijing to issue
instructions to overturn the city union's decisions. Gao openly laments
the stance taken by the middle levels of the union. It is rare for a
low-level trade union chair to engage in this type of frank criticism.
The comments made in the blogs bring
out clearly that most workers in China do not totally dismiss the ACFTU.
They can be disappointed and cynical about Chinese trade unions, but
there is no mention of a desire to set up an independent trade union.
When given the space to struggle against management through existing
legal and institutional structures, if competent and committed
leadership emerges they are willing to rally around it. These blogs are
important vehicles for self-expression, exchanges of information and
ideas, and discussions about collective action.
[back to top]
NFL Star:
Wal-Mart Left Kids Out in the Cold
TMZ
May 14th, 2008
[back to top]
NFL superstar Andre Johnson claims his
charity got stiffed by Wal-Mart -- it all involves water and ice. Yes,
ice.
Johnson ordered 750 bicycles to be
given to underprivileged kids at an event sponsored by the Andre Johnson
Foundation -- in return for the purchase, Wal-Mart agreed to donate
water and ice for the May 3 event.
But there was a problem with the
order, so Johnson ended up buying fewer bikes than planned. Wal-Mart
countered by not giving the water and ice as promised. That's cold.
Wal-Mart is trying to rectify the
situation. They tell TMZ, "We are reaching out to the Andre Johnson
Foundation as we speak to rectify the situation. It's disappointing that
this happened."
[back to top]
Wal-Mart and the Chinese Earthquake: Cheap Help for A Cheap-Labor
Country
by Phil Mattera
www.dirtdiggersdigest.org
May 14, 2008
[back to top]
Wal-Mart Stores has put out a press
release patting itself on the back for promising the equivalent of about
$430,000 for disaster relief and reconstruction for the area of China
hit by a massive earthquake this week. The gesture was laudable but the
amount was less than impressive. After all, the giant retailer would be
nowhere today without the countless Chinese workers who toil in
sweatshops so that American consumers can be offered the cheap goods
that are at the core of the company’s business model. Last year those
largely Chinese-made goods brought Wal-Mart profits of $12.7 billion, or
about $1.4 million every hour of every day. The $430,000 contribution
thus represents less than 20 minutes of profit. Wal-Mart also profits
from Chinese consumers. The company operates more than 200 stores in
China (through joint ventures and minority-owned subsidiaries), several
of which have been shut down because of the tremblor. Wal-Mart was so
eager to operate stores in China that it agreed to let its employees
there be represented by unions (though of the government-dominated
variety). Wal-Mart has a history of using relatively inexpensive amounts
of disaster relief to boost its reputation. After Hurricane Katrina hit
the U.S. Gulf Coast in 2005, Wal-Mart maneuvered to get maximum exposure
for its prompt delivery of relief supplies. A fairly routine operation
for a company possessing the most advanced logistics infrastructure was
seen as nearly miraculous, given the ineptitude of federal and state
public officials. The company made an initial faux pas (quickly
reversed) in announcing that employees at its stores shut down by the
storm would be paid for only three days. It also started out offering a
measly $2 million in relief but soon overcame its parsimonious instincts
and upped the figure by $15 million, thereby winning wide praise. The
wave of favorable coverage went on for several months, thanks at least
in part to the efforts of its army of p.r. operatives from Edelman and a
conservative blogger who was paid to tout Wal-Mart’s hurricane work in
the blogosphere. Wal-Mart may have to part with more than $430,000 to
get a similar public relations bonanza from China’s suffering.
[back to top]
Cities may mute effect of
Wal-Mart
By Sandra M. Jones,
Chicago Tribune
May 13th, 2008
[back to top]
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. appears to have
played a role in putting some retailers out of business since opening
its first Chicago store in Austin more than 18 months ago, but the
effect on its smaller rivals is likely milder than what occurs when the
giant store arrives in a rural town, according to initial findings of a
new study.
Researchers from Loyola University
Chicago and the University of Illinois at Chicago tracked 191 stores
within a three-mile radius of Wal-Mart from March 2006, six months
before the store opened, through November 2007. The team found 23
stores, or 12 percent, of the businesses in the study group shut down
last year.
Their preliminary conclusion is that a
"small but statistically significant relationship" exists between local
companies going out of business and Wal-Mart's arrival in the city. The
researchers cautioned they are "hesitant to draw any strong conclusions"
until a third phase of research is completed later this year.
For more than two decades, academics
have studied Wal-Mart's effect on small-town America, but little is
known about how Wal-Mart affects jobs, wages, property values and sales
in an inner city.
The world's largest retailer has been
moving into big cities and stirring controversy, especially in the
union-dominated North. The researchers claim this is the first empirical
study of the local economic impact of a Wal-Mart in a large city.
"People have their opinions on
Wal-Mart," said Phil Nyden, director of the Center for Urban Research
and Learning at Loyola in Chicago. "The idea is to get some actual data
to inform the debate."
In a bid to win over critics worried
about the giant retailer driving out mom-and-pop stores with larger
selections and lower prices, Wal-Mart launched an unusual program last
year in 10 inner cities, starting in Chicago, aimed at helping local
retailers near its urban stores. It offered to pay for local newspaper
advertising and to showcase the independent stores on Wal-Mart's
in-store TV network and donate funds to the local chambers of commerce.
Called "Jobs and Opportunity Zones
Program," it received mixed reviews. Wal-Mart detractors called it a
publicity stunt. And some participants said the program didn't make much
of a difference in their day-to-day business.
According to the Chicago study, there
is some "limited" evidence stores located closer to Wal-Mart are more
likely to go out of business than those farther away within the
three-mile radius.
Many of the stores that closed last
year sold clothing, beauty supplies and shoes, all items available at
Wal-Mart.
Lawrence LeBlanc, owner of LDL
Furniture and Appliance, said sales at his secondhand-goods store just
down the street from Wal-Mart have fallen dramatically since the
discount chain came to town. The little shop had been generating about
$130,000 to $140,000 in sales a year before Wal-Mart. Last year it rang
up $35,000. The only reason LeBlanc has kept the store open, he said, is
that he owns the building.
"I used to be able to sell 15 to 20
televisions a month," said LeBlanc. "Now I sell two or three."
On the other hand, Norman Delrahim,
owner of B&S Hardware nearby, said that after an initial drop-off in
sales, he thinks business is "a little better" as shoppers come to the
neighborhood to visit Wal-Mart and notice his store.
Wal-Mart said it is attracting new
business to the area, such as the Menards home improvement store going
up across the street.
"There is a lot of development that
has come into the area," said Roderick Scott, senior manager of public
affairs for Wal-Mart in Chicago. "We've been a positive agent in that
change."
The Bentonville, Ark.-based retailer
opened a 142,000-square-foot discount store in the Austin neighborhood
on the West Side in September 2006. It planned to open as many as 20
stores in the city, most of them Supercenters that also sell groceries.
Unions, angling to get non-union
Wal-Mart to pay its workers more in wages and health benefits, fought to
keep Wal-Mart from expanding in the city. Last month the city struck
down a request to allow Wal-Mart to open a second store at Chatham
Market on the South Side.
Researchers plan to learn more about
Wal-Mart's effect on jobs and wages as they complete the final phase of
the study. The last wave of data collection began in March 2008 and runs
through November 2008. The study is financed by Woods Fund of Chicago, a
foundation that helps the poor.
[back to top]
Wal-Mart Reaches 2
Million Workers
Associated Press
May 13th, 2008
[back to top]
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) _ Imagine
Houston being populated only by Wal-Mart workers.
Houston proper, with its population of
just over 2 million, has about the same number of people as Wal-Mart
Stores Inc. now employs worldwide.
Put another way, if a city had only
families of four and one member of each household worked at Wal-Mart,
that would be a perfect fit with the 8 million-strong population of New
York City, a market Wal-Mart happens to covet.
During a recorded call with investors
Tuesday, Wal-Mart President and CEO Lee Scott mentioned offhandedly that
the company now has more than 2 million "associates," as Wal-Mart terms
its employees. Chief Financial Officer Tom Schoewe confirmed in an
interview that Wal-Mart had reached the milestone.
The world's largest retailer is also
the world's largest private employer. The company has about 1.3 million
U.S. workers. As of April 30, Bentonville-based Wal-Mart had 7,343 units
- 4,195 in the U.S. and 3,148 in its international division, which
includes Puerto Rico.
(Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All
rights reserved.
[back to top]
Wal-Mart
profit rises 6.9 pct, beats Street view
Associated Press
05.13.08
[back to top]
BENTONVILLE, Ark. - Wal-Mart Stores
Inc. says its profit rose nearly 7 percent in its first quarter on
higher sales. The results beat Wall Street's expectations.
The world's biggest retailer said
Tuesday it earned $3.02 billion, or 76 cents per share, in the three
months ended April 30. That was up from $2.83 billion, or 68 cents per
share a year earlier.
Analysts polled by Thomson Financial
had projected earnings of 75 cents per share.
The company had overall revenue of
$95.30 billion compared to $86.41 billion in the prior year.
The company cited its low prices as a
reason for its improvement, along with improved customer service and
internal cost savings.
Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All
rights reserved.
[back to top]
Wal-Mart Delivers Good
And Bad News
Ruthie Ackerman,
Market Scan
05.13.08
[back to top]
With American consumer spending under
immense pressure, Wal-Mart Stores surprised Wall Street on Tuesday when
it reported strong sales in its first quarter. Now the question on
investors' minds is how is the world's largest retailer continuing to
lure customers despite the turmoil in the U.S. economy?
The answer: Wal-Mart Stores (nyse: WMT
- news - people ) 's low prices are driving sales with customers
flocking to buy basics like groceries, shampoo, cleaning supplies, and
pharmacy items. But once customers buy what they need they are also
purchasing other items as well. Surprisingly one area of strength was
consumer electronics.
"Customers do shop for things they
want, not just what they need," said Eduardo Castro-Wright, chief
executive of Wal-Mart's U.S. division.
Last week, the International Council
on Shopping Centers reported that April sales at U.S. chain stores open
at least a year, a key retail measure known as same-store sales, rose
3.6% from the similar month in 2007.
U.S. consumers are changing their
habits but still spending, as most retailers reported a boost in April
sales at stores open at least a year, following a downbeat March. The
biggest gains were at stores that sell groceries and other staples,
while discretionary and specialty retailers had mixed results. (See "
Retail To The Rescue")
On Tuesday, Wal-Mart reported its
profit jumped as lower prices boosted sales. But its conservative
guidance spooked investors.
Chief Financial Officer Tom Schoewe
said for the second quarter the company forecasts sales in stores open
at least a year to range from flat to up 2.0%. He said the company
expects to earn between 78 cents and 81 cents per share.
Schoewe also dampened investor
optimism when he said it is still difficult to gauge the impact of
federal tax rebate checks on U.S. sales. A recent survey by American
Century Investments revealed that only one in four Americans plans to
spend any of their stimulus checks--most say they plan to pay off debt
or add to their savings. (See: "Retailers to Customers: Stimulate Us!")
Wal-Mart’s shares fell 1.2%, or 71
cents, to $57.31 in morning trading Tuesday.
But Chief Executive Lee Scott added
some words of encouragement: “We’re off to a solid start, with record
first quarter sales and earnings."
Low prices and improved customer
services were the primary drivers of sales growth, the company said,
despite the “economic headwinds” caused by energy and food inflation.
But not all was well in Bentonville, Arkansas. “There are still
uncertainties during the rest of the year,” Scott said. “The economy is
playing a critical factor in 2008.” Even so, he remarked, Wal-Mart is
well positioned to benefit from the downturn in the economy and a
rebound as well.
Wal-Mart reported earnings jumped
7.1%, to $3.0 billion, or 76 cents per share, in the quarter ended April
30, up from $2.8 billion, or 68 cents per share, in the prior year,
beating analysts’ forecast of 75 cents a share.
The company said overall revenue in
its first quarter jumped 10.3%, to $95.3 billion, up from $86.4 billion
in the prior year. Net sales excluding membership fees rose to $94.1
billion, from $85.4 billion a year ago. Analysts had projected revenue
of $93.5 billion for the quarter.
Excluding fuel, same-store sales for
the first quarter were up 2.9% at Wal-Mart's domestic properties, rising
2.7% in the Wal-Mart Stores division and 3.6% at Sam's Clubs, the
warehouse division.
--The Associated Press contributed to
this article.
[back to top]
Tax evasion 'costs
lives of 5.6m children'
By Sean O'Grady,
The Independent
May 12th, 2008
[back to top]
The lives of more than five million
children could be saved in the developing world – if the super-rich
and the world's largest companies paid their fair share in taxes,
according to a leading British charity. In Death and Taxes: the True
Toll of Tax-dodging, Christian Aid says that the extent of tax abuse "is
so widespread and damaging that it is tantamount to a new slavery".
The charity estimates that governments
in the poorest countries are being cheated out of at least $160bn (£82bn)
a year in tax revenues, much more than the $40 to $60bn the World Bank
estimates is needed to pay for the United Nation's Millennium
Development Goals (MDG). The MDG aim of halving poverty by 2015 would
save 350,000 children's lives a year.
The director of Christian Aid, Dr
Daleep Mukarji, said: "We predict that illegal trade-related tax evasion
alone will be responsible for the deaths of 5.6 million children under
the age of five between 2000 and 2015. That's almost 1,000 a day".
Christian Aid believes that up to $11 trillion of funds may be stashed
away in tax havens.
The report notes the conventional
distinction drawn between tax planning and tax avoidance, which are
legal, and tax evasion, which is not, but says that avoidance is part of
a "sliding scale of legitimacy", in which ever more ingenious and
complex methods are used to get around the rules and shelter corporate
profits, notably through the use of tax havens, places where extreme
secrecy in turn encourages a more general criminality.
It says: "The inescapable fact is that
there are only four reasons for banking 'offshore': to avoid tax, to
evade tax, to function in secret, to sidestep regulations controlling
financial services or monopolistic practices. In each scenario, the
pursuit of profit outweighs all other considerations, including good
citizenship and social responsibility".
Tax havens have come under increasing
scrutiny lately, as European Union governments and the OECD have tried
to rein in their activities. The German secret service recently paid €4m
(£3m) to an informant to reveal details of money held in Lichtenstein.
HM Revenue and Customs is following its example, with the hope of
recovering £100m in lost revenue.
Christian Aid points out that the
British Government has a special responsibility and influence because so
many tax havens are linked to the Crown as overseas territories or crown
dependencies. The list includes Jersey, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, the
Cayman Islands, Bermuda and the British Virgin Islands. Ironically,
Christian Aid adds, even CDC plc, formerly the Commonwealth Development
Corporation and still owned by the Department for International
Development, pays no taxes on its £350m of profits, thanks to its use
of tax havens, even though its main aim is to fund development projects.
High-profile individuals are
criticised by Christian Aid for minimising their tax bills, including
the Formula One racing champion Lewis Hamilton, pop star Phil Collins
and U2 lead singer Bono.
The widespread use of holding
companies in tax havens to hold profits, licences and intellectual
property, all to reduce tax bills, is also condemned: "Every
transnational corporation uses holding companies", it said, and listed
BP, Wal-Mart, Royal Dutch Shell, ExxonMobil and Ford Motor Company's
reinsurance group as benefiting from offshore holdings.
Christian Aid's strongest words are
reserved for the companies and firms of accountants who save billions
through such activities as manipulating invoicing and cost structures to
avoid paying taxes and royalties on mineral rights in developing
economies.
Rather than protecting wealthy "non-doms"
by acquiescing in the system of tax havens, Christian Aid calls on the
British and Irish governments to "support international moves to curtail
...the secrecy of tax havens, thereby lifting the lid on the tax
industry and its machinations".
[back to top]
Pollo
Campero opens franchise in US Wal-Mart store
By JON GAMBRELL
Associated Press
05.12.08
[back to top]
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - Pollo Campero, a
Latin American fried-chicken favorite that had been seen in the U.S.
only in takeout boxes aboard arriving flights, has teamed up with
Wal-Mart to expand its reach to the nation's growing Hispanic
population.
A restaurant bearing the Guatemalan
chain's mascot chicken in a cowboy hat now sells its famed product
inside a Wal-Mart (nyse: WMT - news - people ) Supercenter in Rowlett,
Texas. Officials with the chain's fledging U.S. arm, Campero USA Corp.,
hopes to expand its reach into more than 20 Wal-Mart locations across
the country by the end of 2009.
For the world's largest retailer,
Pollo Campero offers a new opportunity to reach out to its diverse range
of shoppers as it customizes some aisles in its mammoth stores to sell
culturally attuned products.
"It's kind of like when we're looking
at salsa versus ketchup and tortillas versus bread," said Lorenzo Lopez,
a spokesman for Wal-Mart Stores Inc. "All those things have crossed over
very well with customers in general and this has the potential to very
well do the same thing."
Wal-Mart, which largely abandoned
running its own restaurants inside its stores, now leases out space for
companies such as McDonald's Corp. (nyse: MCD - news - people ), Blimpie
International Inc. and Subway. Recently, the company offered Camille's
Sidewalk Cafe, a Tulsa, Okla.-based chain offering healthy fast food, to
begin franchising its brand inside stores.
Pollo Campero, Spanish for "country
chicken," offers a chance to capture a different, but lucrative kind of
clientele. The fast-food chain, created in 1971, talked for years about
moving into the U.S. market. The final push came in 1999, after Grupo
Taca, Central America's main airline, began complaining about the smell
of chicken overwhelming its planes.
Now the company has more than 40
locations in the United States. Rodolfo Jimenez, an executive vice
president of business development with Pollo Campero, said Wal-Mart
approached his company after a restaurant expo last year as part of an
effort to reach Hispanic customers.
"They always said that they had a very
big Hispanic component in their customer base," Jimenez said. "They
wanted to bring in an authentic Latin brand to really be able to please
those customers."
Jimenez said Pollo Campero, owned by
Corporacion Multi-Inversiones, continues to discuss with Wal-Mart where
it could next lease space in a store. The possibilities could be large
for the brand, as even Wal-Mart's hometown of Bentonville has seen its
Hispanic population explode since the 1990s.
But the push isn't limited to
Hispanics. Jimenez said the chain now offers grilled chicken as part of
an effort to please discerning U.S. customers.
The fried chicken, however, continues
to be the restaurant's major draw. Jimenez, who spent time in the
chain's new addition in Rowlett since its opening Thursday, said curious
Wal-Mart customers continue to walk over to examine the Latin fare.
"Most people didn't know the brand,"
Jimenez said. "But just the fact of being there, and it's an open space
and looks nice. We just said we were about chicken, so they came over
and tried the product and they were very pleased."
(This version corrects that the chain
has about 40 locations in the U.S., not 50.)
Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All
rights reserve
[back to top]
Wal-Mart same-store sales top Wall Street expectations
Associated Press
05.08.08 [back to top]
BENTONVILLE, Ark. - Wal-Mart Stores
Inc. says sales of groceries and items such as flat-screen TVs boosted
its same-store sales in April above Wall Street expectations.
The world's largest retailer said
same-store sales rose 3.2 percent, easily beating Wall Street's 2.1
percent growth forecast. Including fuel, same-store sales climbed 3.8
percent.
The sales figure, which counts only
stores open at least one year, is considered a key measure of a
retailer's fiscal health.
Same-store sales rose 2.6 percent at
namesake Wal-Mart (nyse: WMT - news - people ) stores and 6.6 percent at
Sam's Club, excluding fuel.
Total sales for the four weeks ended
May 2 rose 10 percent to $29.18 billion.
The Bentonville, Ark.-based company
says it expects May sales growth by the same measure, excluding fuel, to
be flat to up to 2 percent.
_
AP Business Writer Mae Anderson
Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All
rights reserved
[back to top]
Wal-Mart,
Target issue tepid May sales views
By Nicole Maestri,
Reuters
May 8th, 2008
[back to top]
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wal-Mart Stores
Inc (WMT.N) on Thursday reported a better-than-expected 3.2 percent rise
in April sales at U.S. stores open at least a year, boosted by demand
for basic items like groceries and medicine.
But the world's largest retailer gave
a tepid outlook for May as the economic situation gets more difficult
and consumers try to stretch their dollars by purchasing cheaper cuts of
meat or trading down to pasta.
"The economy continues to get tougher
and the 'paycheck cycle' is more pronounced for customers than in past
months," Eduardo Castro-Wright, head of Wal-Mart's U.S. store division,
said in a statement.
"As money gets tighter for them toward
the end of the month, sales drop more than we have seen in the past."
Smaller rival Target Corp (TGT.N),
whose April sales at existing stores rose a less-than-expected 3.1
percent, also gave a weak forecast for May.
"We continue to see weakness in
markets that are experiencing housing market-related stress,
particularly in Florida, Arizona, Nevada and parts of California,"
Target said on a recorded call.
Wal-Mart shares rose 70 cents or 1.2
percent to $57.53, while Target shares fell $1.13 or 2.1 percent to
$52.31 in morning New York Stock Exchange trading.
Ben Pivar, vice president at
consulting firm Capgemini, said consumers are showing more caution,
buying staples and holding back on splurges, in this environment.
"There's still a lot of uncertainty at
the consumer level with respect to where the economy's going," he said.
WAL-MART SALES SURPASS EXPECTATIONS
Wal-Mart's 3.2 percent gain in April
U.S. sales at stores open at least a year, known as same-store sales,
was above analysts' average forecast for a rise of 2.1 percent,
according to Reuters Estimates. It also surpassed Wal-Mart's own
forecast for a gain of 1 percent to 3 percent.
Same-store sales at its namesake
discount stores rose 2.6 percent, while they advanced 6.6 percent at its
Sam's Club warehouse division.
Wal-Mart said net sales in the month,
ended May 2, rose to $29.18 billion from $26.57 billion a year earlier.
"Customers are buying less expensive
protein sources and trying to stretch their dollars with purchases of
boxed dinners and pasta," the company said on a recorded call.
"Moreover, they are gravitating toward
more private label than in the past few months."
Consumers continued to buy flat-panel
TVs, video games and gaming systems, Wal-Mart said, while the allergy
season boosted sales of prescription and over-the-counter medications.
Apparel sales improved, while sales in
its home department remained soft, it said.
For May, it forecast U.S. same-store
sales would be flat to up 2 percent.
"It's currently difficult to quantify
the impact from the stimulus checks," said Chief Financial Officer Tom
Schoewe, referring to rebate checks being mailed to U.S. consumers as
part of Washington's $152 billion economic stimulus package.
Wal-Mart will report its first-quarter
results on May 13. Last month, it said it expected earnings per share
from continuing operations of 74 cents to 76 cents for the quarter, up
from a previous forecast of 70 cents to 74 cents.
TARGET SALES OFF TARGET
Target's April same-store sales rose
3.1 percent, missing analysts' average forecast for a gain of 4.5
percent. Target had forecast a mid-single-digit increase.
"Comparable store sales performance in
April was slightly below our planned range," Chief Executive Gregg
Steinhafel said in a statement.
Sales were strongest in health care
and consumable items and were weakest in jewelry, home decor and
seasonal items, the retailer said.
Sales for the four weeks ended May 3
increased 9.0 percent to $4.25 billion.
For May, Target forecast same-store
sales between down 1 percent and up 1 percent.
Target's sales have weakened in recent
months as its shoppers overlook purchases of higher margin items like
clothes and home decor in favor of basics like food or laundry
detergent.
[back to top]
A
closeout for Wal-Mart
By Sandra M. Jones,
Chicago Tribune
May 8th, 2008 [back to top]
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s hard-fought
battle to turn Chicago into a beachhead for urban expansion across the
country has come to a quiet end, at least for the foreseeable future, as
big-city politics held sway over low prices.
Now the world's largest retailer is
turning its attention to a backup plan of opening stores just outside
city limits, banking that thousands of low-to-middle-income city
dwellers will travel to collar suburbs to shop at the discount store.
Among the suburbs Wal-Mart is looking at are Calumet Park, Cicero and
McCook, according to people familiar with Wal-Mart's plans.
Wal-Mart got the word from city
officials last month that Mayor Richard Daley doesn't want to risk a
messy showdown with unions over Wal-Mart—like the big-box store battle
of 2006—while Chicago is still in the running as a host city for the
2016 Olympics, according to people familiar with the matter. The
International Olympic Committee is slated to make that decision in
October 2009.
"That's the end of the story, at least
for the next two to three years," said John Melaniphy, a Chicago-based
retail real estate consultant. "I think in the long run they'll end up
in the city one way or another, but it's going to take them a long
time."
Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s development
arm, Archon Group LP, isn't waiting. The Chicago-based developer of
Chatham Market on the South Side, where Wal-Mart had hoped to open its
second city store, put a "For Sale" sign on the property last week.
Lowe's Cos. has already opened a
117,000-square-foot anchor in the shopping center at 83rd Street and
Stewart Avenue. Wal-Mart was slated to be the second anchor and Archon
had counted on the discount chain to attract other retail tenants. The
developer has not been able to find another anchor to replace Wal-Mart.
"We're doing this to see what options
present themselves," said Bill Moston, director of retail investments
for Archon in Chicago. "We have a responsibility to pursue all available
options and to evaluate what they are."
That could mean the empty land would
go for other uses such as office space or storage or housing.
Not long ago Wal-Mart had ambitions of
operating as many as 20 stores in the city. It opened a
142,000-square-foot discount store in the Austin neighborhood on the
West Side in September 2006.
Wal-Mart wanted to open supercenters
in the rest of the city, roughly 180,000-square-foot stores that also
sell groceries.
But the retailer, which has a
non-union workforce, ran into opposition from unions that have been
trying to stop the Bentonville, Ark.-based company's expansion into
northern cities.
Both Wal-Mart and the unions say they
help everyday working families. Wal-Mart points to its affordable
merchandise, willingness to blaze a trail into the food deserts of inner
cities, and the hundreds of workers each store employs. Unions point to
their campaign to persuade Wal-Mart to pay higher wages and health
benefits to workers.
"We are a store that wants to come in
and invest in that community," said Roderick Scott, head of public
affairs for Wal-Mart in Chicago.
Dennis Gannon, president of the
Chicago Federation of Labor and a leader in the unions' battle against
Wal-Mart, declined to comment on the turn of events.
The mayor's press office and Pete
Scales, spokesman for the Department of Planning, declined to comment on
its talks with Wal-Mart.
Chicago Planning Commissioner Arnold
Randall notified Archon on March 14 that he would not let Wal-Mart open
at Chatham Market as proposed because of a letter from the previous
developer that pledged to keep the retailer out.
Wal-Mart and Archon met with the
commissioner last month to look for a way to make the project work.
"We always want additional retailers
in Chicago," Scales said. "Hopefully [the potential sale] will open it
up to other retailers other than Wal-Mart."
Daley, siding with business, took a
political bruising in the summer of 2006 when he overturned, in his
first veto, a big-box ordinance passed by the City Council. The
ordinance, aimed at Wal-Mart, would have set minimum pay and benefit
levels for any major retailer with a store 90,000 square feet or larger.
In the wake of the veto, unions poured
millions into the City Council elections in a successful bid to support
candidates who, among other things, were likely to oppose Wal-Mart's
city expansion.
Wal-Mart Chief Executive H. Lee Scott
first announced his intention to position Wal-Mart as an "urban pioneer"
in an April 2006 speech in Chicago, saying the company "has never been
afraid to invest in communities that are overlooked by other retailers."
But in the two years since, Wal-Mart
has made little headway in expanding into Northern cities. It has yet to
crack Boston, Detroit or New York.
And international markets such as
Brazil are whetting the giant retailer's appetite, making it unclear how
much longer the company will continue to focus on America's inner
cities.
Ald. Howard Brookins (21st), who tried
and failed to bring Wal-Mart to his South Side ward, said he's not happy
with the decision.
He said he plans to woo retailers at
the shopping industry's annual trade show in Las Vegas this month,
hoping to find a replacement for Wal-Mart.
"We're not guaranteed the Olympics,"
said Brookins, "but we're guaranteed to get [sales] tax revenue from
Wal-Mart."
[back to top]
WalMart Adds WMG MP3's.
Napster Next?
By Bruce Houghton,
hyperbot
May 7th, 2008 [back to top]
The Warner Music Group family of
labels has widened its full catalog mp3 offering to include WalMart.com.
Previously Amazon was the only North American based download provider
with the catalog.
Hypebot reported yesterday that WMG
was about to broaden its DRM-free program to include other sites. Last
month WalMart drop all tracks from WMG, Universal and Sony BMG and took
its digital store DRM-free. EMI and a limited number of indies provided
content until this morning when WMG effectively doubled WalMart.com's
catalog.
As it does at brick and morter,
WalMart is...
competing on price with all tracks a
94 cents (up from 88 cents last month) and album downloads from $7.98 -
$9.22. (By contrast iTunes generally prices at $.99 track/$9.99 album
and Amazon's offers variable pricing that is occasionally lower than
WalMart but often hits $.99/$9.99.) Indie music plays only a minor role
on WalMart.com also mimicing in-store content.
WMG's move puts pressure on the other
label groups and download stores to move more rapidly towards all DRM-free.
At yesterday's Digital NARM, a spokesperson for Napster hinted that they
would go DRM-free within a month.
[back to top]
Health Clinics Inside Stores Likely to Slow Their Growth
By DAVID ARMSTRONG ,
Wall Street Journal
May 7th, 2008 [back to top]
The boom in walk-in health clinics
located inside pharmacies, supermarkets and big-box retailers is showing
signs of slowing.
Hailed as an inexpensive option for
treating minor health ailments like sore throats and rashes, the retail
clinics have grown in number to 963 as of May 1 from just 125 three
years ago. The clinics typically feature nurse practitioners who can
prescribe basic drugs, and the price for a visit ranges from $50 to $75.
But in recent months, retail
health-clinic operators based in New York, Nevada, Indiana and Alabama
have closed their doors, shuttering 69 clinics in 15 states, including
ones operating inside outlets of Shopko Stores, Meijer Inc., Bi-Lo LLC,
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and the Medicine Shoppe unit of Cardinal Health
Inc.
Now, the biggest retail-clinic
operator, CVS Caremark Corp., says it is scaling back expansion plans
for its Minute Clinic brand.
"We have seen fallout in this
industry, on a smaller scale, that is not unlike the dot-com bubble,"
says Tom Charland, the owner of industry consultant Merchant Medicine
LLC and a former vice president for strategy at Minute Clinic. "The big
mistake was for people to think they could reach break-even in six
months," he says. "People are learning this is an 18-to-24-month process
to get to break-even."
Mr. Charland says the venture
capitalists and private-equity firms that backed many of the retail
clinic operators failed to appreciate how complicated and expensive the
clinics are to operate. Research shows that patients are enthusiastic
about the clinics' convenience and quality of care, but acceptance has
been slow.
CVS, which operates more than 500
Minute Clinic facilities, says its plan to scale back expansion is part
of a change in strategy. David Rickard, chief financial officer, told
analysts last week that the company expects to add 100 clinics this
year, down from a prior estimate of 200 openings. He said the company
may also close some Minute Clinic locations that aren't in CVS outlets.
He said that CVS will focus on "enriching" services at Minute Clinic
facilities rather than expansion, and that the company believes Minute
Clinic will be a "terrific, successful little business."
Some operators are finding that the
clinics are complex to manage. Earlier this year, Check Ups, a clinic
operator based in New York, abruptly closed 23 clinics that it operated
inside Wal-Marts in Florida, Mississippi, Alabama and Louisiana. It was
stretched thin by operations in multiple states, says company spokesman
William Armstrong.
"You have to have a critical mass of
stores seeing a high number of patients to get somewhere," he says. He
adds that new clinics need to spend a lot of money on marketing to build
public awareness and that the clinics become expensive quickly. "We ran
out of operating funds," he says.
Not everyone is trimming sails.
Walgreen Co. says it still plans to more than double the number of its
Take Care health clinics this year by adding about 240 locations between
now and the end of the year, bringing it closer to the number operated
by rival CVS. The expansion will cause a drag on earnings in fiscal 2008
of five cents a share, the company says.
Tina Galasso, an analyst who follows
the retail clinic industry for Verispan LLC, says the cost of setting up
an in-store clinic runs about $500,000. That is one reason why much of
the future growth in walk-in health centers is expected to come from big
companies with deep pockets and from hospital systems that are already
well-known within a community and don't have to spend so much on
marketing.
In a strategy that combines both
elements, Wal-Mart plans to partner with hospital systems to open as
many as 400 co-branded store clinics by the end of 2010, up from about
50 sites in operation now. That approach is a departure from an earlier
strategy under which Wal-Mart leased space to operators like Check Ups
that weren't associated with hospital systems.
[back to top]
Wal-Mart was whistleblower in OFT's supermarket investigation
By James Hall,
Telegraph
May 5th, 2008 [back to top]
Wal-Mart, the world's biggest
retailer, was the whistleblower behind the Office of Fair Trading's
current probe into alleged price fixing of food and toiletries, The
Sunday Telegraph can reveal.
The investigation has embroiled some
of the world's largest consumer goods manufacturers such as Unilever,
Procter & Gamble and Reckitt Benckiser, as well as UK retail giants,
including Tesco and J Sainsbury.
In blowing the whistle, Wal-Mart,
which owns the Asda chain, has guaranteed itself immunity from a fine
should the OFT discover any cartel activity. Any company found guilty
could be fined up to 10 per cent of its annual worldwide sales, which in
Wal-Mart's case would be $37bn (£18.7bn).
The move is likely to make the US
retailer deeply unpopular with the companies involved, many of whom are
its largest suppliers.
Last weekend this newspaper revealed
that around 100 OFT officials and lawyers raided the offices of the
country's biggest supermarkets ten days ago over allegations of
price-fixing involving dozens of popular household brands, such as PG
Tips, Aquafresh toothpaste and Andrex toilet roll. Consumer goods
companies in the UK and the US were also visited or asked to provide
pricing information.
It is understood that following an
earlier OFT investigation into price-fixing of dairy products, which
resulted in some supermarkets and dairies paying fines of £116m, senior
Wal-Mart and Asda executives made the decision to go to the OFT with new
information.
All the companies involved in the
probe have strenuously denied that they are involved in any cartel
activity, and Asda's decision to tip off the OFT does not mean that
price-fixing has necessarily occurred. The OFT has refused to comment on
the investigation.
Legal experts believe it will be at
least two years until the OFT publishes any findings.
"Things will go quiet and it could
drag on for two years. If the OFT gets a Statement of Objections out
within a year I will be amazed," said one executive.
Other senior supermarket executives
have dismissed the raids as a "fishing expedition". However, under its
remit, the OFT needs to have a so-called evidential threshold before it
can launch a raid, meaning that it must have good reason.
Last week the Competition Commission,
the anti-trust watchdog, completed a separate two-year investigation
into the supermarket sector. The commission gave the sector a largely
clean bill of health, although it said that it had uncovered emails that
"might raise issues of co-ordination" between supermarkets and
suppliers.
Peter Freeman, chairman of the
Competition Commission, said that the watchdog had passed on information
to the OFT as part of the latter's new investigation.
He added that there was no
contradiction between the commission finding the sector largely
competitive and the OFT examining alleged price-fixing.
[back to top]
Wal-Mart's Shirts
of Misery from Bangladesh
By P. Singh,
Cité Libre
May 4th, 2008
[back to top]
When you purchase a shirt in Walmart,
do you ever imagine young women in Bangladesh forced to work from 7:30
a.m. to 8:00 p.m., seven days a week, paid just 9 cents to 20 cents an
hour, who are denied health care and maternity leave; screamed at to
work faster; with monitored bathroom visits; and who will be fired for
daring to complain or ask for their rights?
At the Beximco factory in the Dhaka
Export Processing Zone in Bangladesh, there are 1,000 workers, at least
80 percent of them young women, sewing shirts and pants for Walmart and
other retailers. Beximco is a sweatshop, where human rights are
systematically violated.
Shame on Walmart
Walmart and its contractor Beximco do
not pay the overtime premium. In fact, as we have seen, they do not even
pay the legal hourly wage of 33 cents. They pay only 20 cents an hour
and pay overtime at this same illegal 20-cent rate.
These workers are locked in poverty,
being cheated out of over $20 a week in legal wages by the largest
retailer in the world. The workers are being illegally paid just $16 for
a full 80-hour workweek. For the forced 80-hour week, they should be
earning at least $36.96. Surely Walmart, with $7.6 billion in annual
operating profits, could afford this wage!
Some of the poorest people in the
world are being illegally robbed of their wages, driving them deeper
into misery. Even the 33-cent an hour wage does not come close to
meeting basic subsistence needs.
This is why in Bangladesh there is no
difference in the malnutrition rate of children whether their parents
are unemployed or are working in factories sewing garments for the
largest U.S. companies. Even the legal minimum wage is set too low to
allow the workers to climb out of misery.
No maternity leave: At Beximco, legal
maternity leave is denied and benefits are not paid.
Denied health care: By law, a factory
the size of Beximco should have a health clinic, with a doctor present.
Beximco has nothing. There is an empty first aid box for show. The women
workers and their children have absolutely no health coverage or
protection.
Access to bathrooms limited: The
workers need a ticket and permission to use the bathrooms. Access is
limited and bathroom breaks are timed.
Maltreatment/cursing/yelling: There is
constant pressure to meet the high daily production goal; the workers
are yelled at and cursed at to work faster.
Cheated of their tiny savings: In
Bangladesh there is a government regulated savings system whereby a
small deduction is made each pay period from the workers' wages and
deposited in the Provident Fund, which the factory maintains. The
workers can withdraw their savings from this fund when they leave the
factory or are fired. It functions as a kind of severance pay, to act as
a bridge or means of support while new work is sought. But most workers
at Beximco, who have been forced to leave, report that they are cheated
of their savings.
No worker has seen Walmart's Code of
Conduct: Walmart says it has a corporate code of conduct which
guarantees the human and worker rights of anyone sewing Walmart garments
around the world. Even by industry standards, Walmart's code of conduct
is very limited and extremely weak. Yet the workers at Beximco have
never even seen this weak code of conduct. Walmart's code is not posted
and it has never been explained to the workers. There has been no
attempt to implement the code.
No right to organize: In Bangladesh's
EPZs, unions and collective contracts are prohibited by law. The workers
have no rights; the government authorities do nothing to implement labor
law. The workers are fired for daring to protest forced 24-hour shifts.
Denied their right to organize, the workers are isolated and vulnerable
-- easily cheated of their legal wages and benefits.
Falling Real Wages
Devaluation and inflation have further
eroded the real purchasing power of the Bangledeshi workers' wages.
The local currency, the taka, has lost
19% of its value against the U.S. dollar since 1995. (In 1995, there
were TK 40.90 to $1.00. By October 1998, the taka had fallen to TK 48.50
to $1.00).
There is a five to six percent
inflation rate each year.
Greed in the Global Economy
Walmart and its contractor pay no
taxes to sew their garments in the Dhaka EPZ. All that they leave behind
is the illegal 20-cent an hour wages and some small rent and fees.
In 1998, total government revenues in
Bangladesh amounted to $3.872 billion (TK 187.8 billion), a sum far too
low to even provide the most basic services to the over 125 million
people in the country.
On the other hand, Walmart's sales in
1998 amounted to $137.6 billion, which means that Walmart's annual sales
are 36 times greater than the total revenues of the Bangladeshi
government. Yet Walmart does not pay a single cent in taxes or tariffs!
Nothing!
Bangladesh, one of the poorest nations
in the world, is being forced to subsidize Walmart.
Due to an inadequate tax base and
overall low government revenues, Bangladesh must rely upon foreign aid
to meet more than one-half of its entire development budget.
In the United States, Walmart also
seeks multi-million-dollar state, county and city subsidies as a
condition for locating its stores. But there is another indirect subsidy
as well: one half of Walmart's 720,000 employees, or "associates" as the
company calls them, qualify for federal assistance under the food stamp
program. Wages at Walmart, now the largest private sector employer in
the U.S., start as low as $5.75 an hour.
[back to top]
Walmart.com using Wii Fit to boost Mom's Day sales
By Nicole Maestri,
Reuters
May 2nd, 2008
[back to top]
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Forget the
flowers and candy -- Nintendo Co Ltd's highly anticipated "Wii Fit"
video game will debut in the U.S. later this month, and Wal-Mart Stores
Inc's online division is trying to persuade shoppers to order the game
as "a perfect gift" for Mother's Day.
This weekend, the Walmart.com homepage
will be dominated by the Wii Fit -- a physical exercise program that
uses a pressure-sensing board as a controller -- including a link to
order the product now, ahead of its May 19 U.S. launch.
Through May 11, shoppers who
"pre-order" the $89.74 game, or pay in advance to guarantee delivery
when the game launches, will also get a $10 online gift card to use for
a future order at Walmart.com.
"Initial response is extremely strong,
and we're feeling really good about Nintendo Wii Fit dominating the home
page," said Kelly Thompson, Walmart.com's chief merchant, of early
shopper demand for the game. "... We really like the angle of marketing
it to Mom."
The move comes as retailers look for
creative ways to entice shoppers to keep spending amid the economic
downturn.
Many U.S. consumers are shunning
discretionary purchases as more of their budgets go toward rising food
and fuel costs, and they have run out of access to easy credit to fund
their shopping sprees.
Retailers now see holidays, like
Mother's Day on May 11, as potential bright spots when cash-strapped
shoppers may be persuaded to spend some of their limited cash.
According to a National Retail
Federation Mother's Day survey, consumers, on average, intend to spend
$138.63 on the holiday -- down from $139.14 last year.
STRONG SALES GROWTH
But the survey also found that
consumers will shell out $1.2 billion this Mother's Day on consumer
electronics like digital cameras, digital photo frames and video
cameras.
In addition, while U.S. consumers have
pulled back on many discretionary purchases, video game hardware and
software continue to post strong sales growth.
U.S. sales of video game hardware and
software rose 57 percent in March from a year earlier, according to
market research firm NPD.
Sales of gaming hardware, software and
accessories hit $1.7 billion in March, led by Nintendo's Wii console,
which posted its biggest nonholiday month ever. Wii Fit, to be played
using the Wii console, has already has sold more than a million units in
Japan.
Walmart.com is seeing a trend toward
consumers buying more tech-related gifts, like digital photo frames or
cameras, for mothers, Thompson said.
With Wii Fit, Nintendo is trying to
appeal to new video game users, like women and older consumers.
"You'll see our marketing programs
really reach out to both genders and a range of ages," said Cammie
Dunaway, executive vice president of sales and marketing for Nintendo's
U.S. operations, in an interview with Reuters in February.
Dunaway said such gamers will still be
drawn to the novelty and sophistication of Wii Fit and its bathroom
scale-sized controller, which uses sensors to detect subtle shifts in a
person's stance.
Thompson said Walmart.com has worked
with Nintendo on the Wii Fit promotion and ensuring it has a strong
inventory position to fill the pre-orders. There also will be a link on
the site to buy the Wii console, as well as other games and accessories.
Thompson said consumers can give the
$10 gift card to mothers on Mother's Day since the Wii Fit will not ship
until after the May 11th holiday.
[back to top]
Wal-Mart won't build
Duluth Supercenter
By EILEEN DRENNEN,
Atlanta Journal Constitution
May 2nd, 2008
[back to top]
Wal-Mart announced late Thursday night
that it would not build a 176,000-square-foot Supercenter at the corner
of Peachtree Industrial Boulevard and Sugarloaf Parkway in Duluth.
While every step of the stores rollout
was greeted by crowds of protesters wearing red T-shirts and carrying
"Stop Wal-Mart" signs, there was no indication that pressure from
neighborhood group Smart Growth Gwinnett had an effect on the decision.
Instead, company spokesman Glen
Wilkins said in a press release, the decision was "related to Wal-Mart's
announcement in June 2007 to more strategically prioritize development
of Supercenters."
There are already two Wal-Mart stores
within six miles of the proposed location, in Duluth and neighboring
Suwanee.
"While this decision is certainly an
appropriate one from a business standpoint," Wilkins said in the
release, "it takes nothing away from the fact that Duluth is an
excellent community and a great place to do business."
Smart Growth's Marline Santiago-Cook,
who lives directly across Peachtree Industrial near the proposed
Supercenter, said the group was not just excited about Wal-mart's
decision, but the larger changes that resulted from their lengthy fight.
As part of the larger citywide debate about managing development, the
city of Duluth adopted a large-scale building ordinance last December
that governs all facets of projects over 75,000 square feet.
"Not only did we achieve our goals of
stopping this particular project," Santiago-Cook said, "but we got a
bigger win by the implementation of the new ordinance, which will
address any future project at this particular site as well as in the
entire city of Duluth."
The two lawsuits filed against the
city of Duluth by landowner Jack Bandy – who wanted to sell his
30-acre site to Wal-Mart – are still pending in Gwinnett Superior
Court. The first, alleging that the city violated the open records act
by approving a moratorium on large-scale buildings without first
advertising it on an agenda, has a trial date set for Sept. 15.
[back to top]
DoJ Files Decree Ordering Wal-Mart To Pay Veteran $12,000
By Amanda Harris Falls,
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
May 1st, 2008
[back to top]
The Department of Justice said
Thursday it filed a consent decree that will resolve its employment
lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) on behalf of Sean Thornton.
The consent decree will require the
Bentonville, Ark., retailer to pay Thornton $12,000 in back pay, less
income tax and other withholdings, if it is approved by the court.
The Justice Department filed the
complaint March 31 in the U.S. District Court of Orlando, Fla., alleging
Wal-Mart violated the law by not reinstating Thornton to his civilian
job as a cashier in the Orange City, Fla., store, after he was
discharged by the Air Force.
[back to top]
VIDEOS
[back to top]
Fighting
Wal-Martization 25min. (2005)
A new video by
The Labor Video Project 25 min.
(2005)
Wal-Mart is now the largest private
employer in the United States and has the same impact that General
Motors had nearly 50 years ago. This 26-minute video shows why working
people and trade unionists are fighting back and what Wal-Mart has in
store for the communities it is seeking to build stores in. "Fighting
Wal-Martization" is a hard hitting documentary that looks at how the
constant price cutting not only drives local small businesses out of the
community but how this ends up driving down the living conditions of the
very people who shop at Wal-Mart. The video also looks at the healthcare
crisis and how Wal-Mart increases its profits by sending it¹s employees
to public hospitals to get treatment thereby shifting costs back onto
the taxpayer. This video can be used at union meetings, community
meetings and on cable TV to get the message out about the Wal-Martization of America and what it means to every working person.
Please mail your check of
$20.00 and order form to
Labor Video Project
P. O. Box 720027,
San Francisco, CA 94172
For more info:
lvpsf@labornet.org, (415) 282-1908
Wal-Mart: The
High Cost of Low Prices (www.walmartmovie.com)
Independent America: The Two Lane Search for Mom & Pop
(www.independentamerica.net)
Big Box
Mart
(www.jibjab.com)
Garth
Brooks Parody
(www.walmartworkersrights.org)
"Is Wal-Mart
Good for America?" Frontline, PBS Video,
(www.pbs.org)
[back to top]
[back to top]
NON-FICTION
The Case Against Wal-Mart By Al Norman Raphel
Marketing ruth@raphael.com
Wal-Mart: The Face Of Twenty-First Century Capitalism Edited By
Nelson Lichtenstein The New Press
www.thenewpress.com
The Great Risk Shift: The Assault on American Jobs, Families, Health
Care and Retirement By Jacob S. Hacker Oxford University Press
www.oup.com
War On The Middle Class: How the Government, Big Business, and Special
Interest Groups Are Waging War on the American Dream and How to Fight
Back By Lou Dobbs Viking, a member of Penguin Group
www.penguin.com
Momentum: Igniting Social Change in the Connected Age By Allison H.
Fine Jossey-Bass www.joseybass.com
Big-Box Swindle: The True Cost of Mega-Retailers
and the Fight for America's Independent Businesses, By Stacy
Mitchell, www.beacon.org
www.newrules.org
Wal-Mart: The Face Of the Twenty-First-Century
Capitalism, Edited by Nelson Lichtenstein, Published by The New
Press
www.thenewpress.com
The Bully Of Bentonville - How the high cost of
Wal-Mart's Everyday Low Prices is Hurting America, By Anthony Bianco,
Published by Doubleday
Email:
specialmarkets@randomhouse.com
How Wal-Mart is Destroying
America (and the world), By Bill Quinn,
Published By Ten Speed Press, Box 7123, Berkeley, CA 94707,
www.tenspeed.com (pp. 163)
Slam
Dunking Wal-Mart, By Al Norman, Published By
Raphel Marketing, 12 S. Virginia Avenue, Atlantic City, New Jersey
08410,
www.sprawl-busters.com (pp. 237)
The
Great American JobsScam, By Greg LeRoy,
Published By Barrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., 235 Montgomery Street,
Suite 650, San Francisco, CA 94104-2916,
www.bkconnection.com (pp. 257)
Nickel
and Dimed, By Barbara Ehrenreich, Published By
Henry Holt and Company, LLC, 115 West 18th Street, New York,
NY 10011,
www.henryholt.com (pp.221)
United
States of Wal-Mart, By John Dicker, Published
By Jeremy P. Tarcher (Penguin Group usa),
www.us.penguingroup.com (pp.257)
The Wal-Mart Effect, By Charles Fishman
www.penguin.com
Megamall On The Hudson, By David Porter and
Chester L. Mirsky
www.trafford.com
FICTION
Death
By Discount, By Mary Vermillion, Published By
Alyson Publications, P.O. Box 4371, Los Angeles, CA 90078-4371,
www.maryvermillion.com (pp. 275)
[back to top] |